SEE, — HOW the complexities of
FIELD THEORIES HID from us, the fact that relative motion (phase) between all these spinning entities, in the micro & macro universe, gives us all the attractive and repulsive Fundamental Forces.
Field Theories in html:

Also, Field Theories in Word:

& Field Theories in Adobe pdf:

Fitzpatrick's 1966 book showed the relative motion laws of A. Ampère unified the forces.
Fitz's first book in 1966

Fitz's 1966 book in PDF

EVERYTHING on these links herein are FREE, & NO pop up ads with these either.

This was the way the site --below-- looked many years ago. - - Dan Fitz.

Stephen Wolfram's right and Freeman Dyson is wrong.


Not everyone is one hundred percent right all the time.

In his thousand page "A New Kind of Science", Stephen Wolfram may not be one hundred percent right either but I am going to bet that he will be proven mostly right and that Freeman Dyson will be proven absolutely wrong for saying Stephen Wolfram's book is worthless.

Like Stephen Wolfram, I too have been saying that there is indeed a simple model and a few simple rules behind the way this entire universe works.

Like Stephen Wolfram, I too have been warning about this unwarranted belief that our math will give us the answer as to how this entire universe of ours works.

I've given my opinion here after reading Stephen Wolfram's entire book.

It is my understanding that Freeman Dyson gave his opinion after only reading a small part of "A New Kind of Science".

If Stephen Wolfram and I are both correct then binary stars of the same mass will be found to have opposite spins and this is something that should shock Freeman Dyson and knock him from his lofty position as self appointed high priest of science.

You and I and Stephen Wolfram only have to wait and see.

When astronomers find this to be true then all of us will know that Stephen Wolfram's right and Freeman Dyson is wrong.