FREE !! Click ANY of these links below to get what you want. FREE !!
c.squared.pdf 11-25-2017 (Adobe)
c.squared.doc 11-25-2017 (Word)
was correct saying Quantum Theory was NOT Complete.This Change
does indeedComplete Quantum Theory
Here's the Change:
The Present science model has some impossibilities in it that I have been attempting to circumvent since 1948. I've been very lucky to have been well paid to solve problems connected to all these wonderful new items our scientists were creating in the 1950s, 60s and 70s. I'm 84 now and am living in one of the best houses I've ever lived in on hundreds of acres with an 8 foot high fence completely surrounding them and with gates the public can't get through. Needless to say, I enjoy my privacy.
I've never had any real worries and have been true to what was written under my photograph when I graduated from Linden High School in 1950,"Science is the Key to Life."
It's hard for me to believe that I've had almost no competition in putting all these many pieces of this big science puzzle together year after year after year. If you click on the image of the turning earth (top of page) then you will get a paper I wrote in 2015 but even since then I've put more pieces of the puzzle together. Maybe that's what's keeping me alive so long!
Here, on this page, the problem of Minkowski's light cone is solved and with it we complete Quantum Theory the way Einstein wanted it done, I believe.
OK, Minkowski gave us his light cone to enable quantum entanglement which restricts entanglement between the electron that gives a quantum of energy and the other electron that receives it, no matter the time involved between the two events.But there's a much simpler way to do this!
You merely change two present science beliefs: We know that light energy is inversely proportional to the square of the distance of the light. But we know light is always delivered in chunks or quanta. So, merely say the NUMBER of quanta are inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Mathematically it's exactly the same.
But doing this we have to have a scheme where not even one quantum of energy changes with distance, and this we do by listening to what Einstein told us in 1954.
Einstein said this:"I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."
Einstein is warning us about bothcontinuous structures and modern science isn't he?
We know energy is always delivered in quantum chunks but what is energy? Energy is mass times speed. Speed is space in a certain time or spacetime. This is almost telling you that not only energy but spacetime also must be in quantum chunks too.
This greatly simplifies things: because now if none of these spacetime quantum chunks are directly in the way of these two far distanced electrons, energy can be delivered WITHOUT SPACE or TIME actually being involved in the transfer. Yes, we would measure both space and time being involved because we are large and would have a large number of these spacetime quantum chunks directly in line between us and the star giving us light.
But really with no spacetime quantum chunksin line directly between those two electrons, they would be transferring their binding, and therefore their binding energy, in line directly between themselves with absolutely NO SPACE and NO TIME, in line directly between themselves, wouldn't they?
While a quantum of energy is limited to ONLY where there are in-phase bindings,a quantum of spacetime is limited to ONLY where there are out-of-phase linkages. So this is the first paper telling you exactly what these spacetime quanta and therefore these worm holes are.
As Einstein warned us, spacetime is NOT acontinuous structure.
Scientists knew about these worm holes but you must take theseSpacetime Quantum Chunks, that I discovered, along with the worm holes that they discovered before you can get the BIG PICTURE of reality.
How these things do this you can find out by clicking that turning earth image,animatedgif.net, at the top of the page. I've already solved that mystery in the past few years.I've really enjoyed putting all these pieces of this major jigsaw puzzle together, all by myself, practically.
And it's all there for anyone to read FREE. But if the establishment didn't listen to Einstein's warnings then they certainly aren't going to listen to me.
As I write this, my feeling is that even though I get no closer to unifying the forces, thatI did exactly what Einstein said had to be done, I made Quantum Theory more complete!
VERY LATEST IN SCIENCE: Do Ampere's Laws give us the final answer to DARK MATTER?
7-7-2017.The final answer to the cause of Dark Matter.htm
Final and SIMPLE answer to the DARK MATTER attractive force.
In Word: 7-7-2017.Answer to DARK MATTER.doc
7-7-2017 Answer to DARK MATTER also in Adobe.pdf - 7-7-2017.Answer to DARK MATTER.pdf
Be sure to read: http://www.amperefitz.com/phase.symmetry.htm
See this short, clear picture:http://www.amperefitz.com/principle-of-equivalence.htm
There's a lot more too.
And this you can find out by buying one of my booksUniversities Asleep at the Switch at Amazon.com or by reading it FREE simply by clicking the following links:
http://www.amperefitz.com/ua_20071020_ck_ds_jm_ds.pdf (This is the book FREE in Adobe.).
Web pages are at: http://www.amperefitz.com
Thanks for reading this & 40 years of my works: amperefitz.com/4.decades.htm
This page can be copied and published by anyone as long as it is copied and published in its entirety.
Jan. 30, 2017
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.