R B Duncan Press

Scientific Letter
A Forum for Independent Voices
November 26, 2006 Edition

(amperefitz.com homepage)

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr. answers some Scalar Wave questions


(Reprinted with permission)


If you follow this then you will not only learn a bit about scalar waves but you will also see why string theory is correct seeing the different dimensions caused by different frequencies.

But this will be for tomorrow's supercomputers.

Today's accuracy only requires a different dimension for the bandwidth of each different frequency spin/orbit system.

You'll see this too.



FIRST: You do not have to know how to do the tensor math of general relativity but you absolutely must know how the tensor math works.

In general relativity the tensor math shows the deformation of spacetime.

But it shows this deformation of spacetime not in force but in more spacetime than average or less spacetime than average.

There is no element of force in this tensor math only more or less spacetime than average.

But this is the same as force, isn't it?

Because less spacetime than average would represent an attractive force and more spacetime than average would be the same as a repulsive force.

Please remember all this.



Dr. Milo Wolff gave us the first mathematical proof of Mach's principle in that the electron is a spherical, scalar, standing wave resonance.

He showed that each electron here is being continuously created via the energy of surrounding electrons as far away as the Hubble limit.

Not all resonances are standing waves but a scalar resonance must of necessity be a standing wave.

Later Dr. Wolff proved the spin of the electron is also a standing wave.

The premise of this concept, that I'm putting forth in my book, is that all these entities, we see spinning and orbiting in our microcosm and macrocosm, are essentially scalar wave entities that all basically behave the same way.



As these scalar waves add the spin component then this changes them in so far as their closest sides can be either more in phase or more out of phase with the closest sidesof their nearest neighbor and surrounding neighbors and therein is the rub.

If their closest sides are more in phase than average then an attractive force will be seen to exist between these two entities.

If their closest sides are more out of phase than average then these two entities will be seen to have a repulsive force between them.

Space, therefore, is continuously being generated via the closest sides of each that are more OUT OF PHASE with one another.

The reason Ampere's laws work, to show this attraction and repulsion, is that these spin frequenciea are so high compared to any other vibratory motions.

What you do have to see is that space (spacetime) is being continuously generated via the closest sides of all these scalar standing wave entities.

Whether it's quarks, electrons, stars, galaxies or super clusters of galaxies, this in phase out of phase rule pertains to all.

The important thing is to remember that an AVERAGE amount of spacetime is being generated via the closest sides of ALL these spinning entities.

These spins of quarks, electrons, stars and galaxies are the most important thing to look at because they are creating not only your spacetime but all the forces as well.

These university people are being well paid.

But did any of them see this?

No, not even one of those collecting all those millions of paychecks, your tax money provided them with, saw any of this whatsoever.

It's simply incredible that these universities stayed asleep on this one.

String theory tells us that this spacetime being produced at these different spin/orbit frequencies will therefore constitute entirely different dimensions or entirely different spacetime realms.

This is what is really going on.

But it will take future super computers to accurately work this all out.

This is why Newton's motion concept is only accurate at very low speeds where there is absolutely no change of relative mass.

But since our ancestors only knew these slow speeds and never encountered any change of mass, they most firmly believed this religion of Newton.

Even though Newton's concept is wrong for more than 99.984% of the available speeds and only right for less than .016% of the extremely slow speeds it, nevertheless, is the most favored religion being presently espoused by the universities.

They know it to be this wrong.

They know it must continuously be corrected.

Yet this is what they are forced to preach failing to have the correct answer.

Want the correct answer?

Read "Universities Asleep at the Switch"


Buy "Universities Asleep at the Switch" at Amazon.com or by reading it FREE simply by clicking the following links:

http://www.amperefitz.com/unvasleep.htm (This link is faster if you have dial up.)

http://www.amperefitz.com/ua_20071020_ck_ds_jm_ds.pdf (This is the book FREE in Adobe.).



Return to amperefitz homepage

2006 amperefitz
All rights reserved
Comments or complaints about anything on this site???
post to: Daniel P. Fitzpatrick